Motorola Droid 3 Review - Third Time's a Charmby Brian Klug on July 30, 2011 12:01 AM EST
If ever a product has summed up the progression of the Android ecosystem, it’s the Motorola Droid. The first Droid catapulted Android into the mainstream with its first 2.x release, and since then the Droid itself has seen a yearly update cadence that honestly has shown no sign of stopping. The updates thus far track the trends that we’ve seen affect the Android ecosystem as a whole - newer and better versions of Android alongside ever increasing SoC performance, display improvements, camera improvements, and refined hardware design.
I think that pretty much sums up what kind of update the Motorola Droid 3 (henceforth just Droid 3) is. It’s an iterative product launch, for sure, but that belies just how good the improvements all around really are. I noted a few of them already - the Droid 3 includes a dual core OMAP 4430 SoC, larger 4” qHD display, more internal storage, better camera, front facing camera, and most notably a much improved 5 row QWERTY keyboard.
Of course the huge question mark is what has improved connectivity-wise on the Droid 3. There’s no 4G LTE baseband, however, instead of repeating the Droid 2 and Droid 2 Global duopoly, Motorola just went ahead and made the Droid 3 global from the start. That’s right, it’s a dual-mode phone. It’s no consolation if you’re still waiting for an LTE enabled device with a physical keyboard (for that, you’ll have to wait for Samsung to release its rumored next device), but in my mind right now you can either have multi-mode global (CDMA2000 and GSM/UMTS) compatibility or multi-mode (CDMA2000 and LTE) with 4G connectivity. As of yet there’s no having it both ways.
We’ll talk more about all of that in due time, but for now let’s just go over the Droid 3’s outward physical appearance and hardware.
First off, the Droid 3 is notably larger than its predecessor. It’s 3 mm wider, 7 mm taller, but almost 1 mm thinner. Those changes in outline are both to accommodate the 4” screen (as opposed to 3.7”) and likewise the additional keyboard row. Mass is up as well, from 169 to 184 grams. I won’t bore you with all the specifications that have changed, you can just check out the table below.
|HTC Thunderbolt||Motorola Droid 2||Motorola Droid X2||Motorola Droid 3|
|Height||122 mm (4.8")||116.3 mm (4.6")||126.5 mm (4.98")||123.3 mm (4.85")|
|Width||67 mm (2.63")||60.5 mm (2.4")||65.5 mm (2.58")||64.1 mm (2.52")|
|Depth||13.2 mm (0.52")||13.7 mm (0.54")||9.9 - 14.4 mm (0.39"-0.57")||12.9 mm (0.51")|
|Weight||183.3 g (6.46 oz)||169 g (5.9 oz)||148.8 g (5.25 oz)||184 g (6.49 oz)|
|CPU||1 GHz MSM8655 45nm Snapdragon||1 GHz Cortex-A8 OMAP 3620||1 GHz Dual Core Cortex-A9 Tegra 2 AP20H||1 GHz Dual Core Cortex-A9 OMAP 4430|
|GPU||Adreno 205||PowerVR SGX 530||ULP GeForce||PowerVR SGX 540|
|RAM||768 MB LPDDR2||512 MB LPDDR2||512 MB LPDDR2||512 MB LPDDR2|
|NAND||4 GB NAND with 32 GB microSD Class 4 preinstalled||8 GB integrated, preinstalled 8 GB microSD||8 GB NAND, 8 GB microSD class 4 preinstalled||16 GB NAND, up to 32 GB microSD|
|Camera||8 MP with autofocus and dual LED flash, 720p30 video recording, 1.3 MP front facing||5 MP with dual LED flash and autofocus||8 MP with AF/LED Flash, 720p30 video recording||8 MP with AF/LED Flash, 1080p30 video recording, VGA (0.3MP) front facing|
|Screen||4.3” 800 x 480 LCD-TFT||3.7" FWVGA 854 x 480 IPS-LCD||4.3" 960 x 540 RGBW LCD||4.0" 960 x 540 RGBW LCD|
|Battery||Removable 5.18 Whr||Removable 5.2 Whr||Removable 5.65 Whr||Removable 5.65 Whr|
Subjectively however, I was shocked at just how thin the Droid 3 feels in the hand in spite of the slide-out keyboard. It seems like generally there’s a certain amount of unacceptable overhead that always comes alongside including an actual keyboard, yet the Droid 3 manages to do it without making it painfully obvious that everything was designed around it instead of with it.
The other major difference is how much different the Droid 3 feels compared to the Droid 2 - entirely as a result of the device using squared edges instead of the rounded chamfers that ringed the Droid 2. There’s been a recent slow march away from rounded industrial design to one dominated by rigid 90 degree angles, and the Droid 3 follows that trend with this move.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
EndlessChris - Saturday, July 30, 2011 - linkGreat review as always. Looks like this will be my new phone :)
RaistlinZ - Saturday, July 30, 2011 - linkSharp lookin' phone. I like.
vol7ron - Sunday, July 31, 2011 - linkI like this too, larger screen, nice looking keyboard, great looking device. It seems to have it all.
One thing, does it really have a 0.3MP front-facing camera? I would suspect 1.3MP would be more realistic, especially since there are probably economies of scale for that technology right now.
Brian Klug - Friday, August 5, 2011 - linkVol7ron,
It definitely does have a 0.3 MP (VGA) front facing camera. http://developer.motorola.com/products/droid-3-xt8...
I'd like to see 1.3 MP sensors on the front for sure, but at this point it doesn't make sense until both the per-pixel quality is the same (same size pixels) and there are apps that can actually do some HD teleconferencing (like if Skype had support). We're almost there though.
Myrandex - Monday, August 1, 2011 - linkIt would be for me if it wasn't for this bastardization that Verizon did:
The obvious next part of the story is that WCDMA HSPA+ 14.4 Mbps connectivity. Unfortunately, Verizon has locked the retail Droid 3 out of seeing USA-based GSM/WCDMA networks with an MCC (Mobile Country Code) lock.
Why can't Verizon just allow the hardware to perform at its fullest rather than finding some way to lock it down? They have always been terrible about locking their phones in some way.
themossie - Saturday, July 30, 2011 - linkTried the Droid 3 in store the day it came out, mixed feelings about the screen.
Found it very usable for applications, not usable for serious reading (news, ebooks, etc). First time I've suffered eyestrain from an LCD screen with decent brightness and contrast. Droid 1 works great for this use case.
Brian, Anand and the rest of the AnandTech team - any opinions on this? Anyone else?
themossie - Saturday, July 30, 2011 - linkAlso, thanks for the great review - business as usual at Anandtech!
steven75 - Saturday, July 30, 2011 - linkIndeed. Can't believe he tried to equate this pentile display with less resolution in a larger screen size (significantly worse PPI) with the retina display. They aren't even close.
bplewis24 - Saturday, July 30, 2011 - linkI'll trust the guy who looks at hundreds of phones per year over the hyperbolic masses who troll the internet.
I'll also trust my own eyes and science, which prove you wrong.
Finraziel - Sunday, July 31, 2011 - linkWell, I'll also trust my own eyes, and the picture right above where Brian says he doesn't mind pentile too much really makes the droid3's screen look like crap compared to the lower resolution droid2 right next to it. My experience with other pentile screens also suggests there's absolutely no point in increasing the resolution only by using a trick like this, you end up with noticably lower effective resolution. I'd prefer an actually sharp screen over impressive specifications.
I really hope when the 720p screen phones come out in the next half year or so they wont be using cheap tricks like this.