The Intel SSD 760p 512GB Review: Mainstream NVMe Done Rightby Billy Tallis on January 23, 2018 11:30 AM EST
AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer
The Destroyer is an extremely long test replicating the access patterns of very IO-intensive desktop usage. A detailed breakdown can be found in this article. Like real-world usage, the drives do get the occasional break that allows for some background garbage collection and flushing caches, but those idle times are limited to 25ms so that it doesn't take all week to run the test. These AnandTech Storage Bench (ATSB) tests do not involve running the actual applications that generated the workloads, so the scores are relatively insensitive to changes in CPU performance and RAM from our new testbed, but the jump to a newer version of Windows and the newer storage drivers can have an impact.
We quantify performance on this test by reporting the drive's average data throughput, the average latency of the I/O operations, and the total energy used by the drive over the course of the test.
The Intel SSD 760p falls on the good side of a big gap in average data rate scores on The Destroyer. Scoring far below the 760p are SATA drives and most earlier entry-level NVMe SSDs. The 760p is a bit slower than some of the drives using planar MLC NAND or 3D TLC NAND, but it is clear that the 760p is capable of handling The Destroyer better than any previous SSD in its price range.
The average and 99th percentile latency scores don't provide the clear separation that the average data rate shows, so the Intel 760p simply looks a bit below average for a NVMe SSD. Given the relative pricing and the poor performance of the Intel 600p, that's a good result for the 760p.
Breaking down the average latency by reads and writes, the Intel SSD 760p ranks about the same either way. It is roughly on par with the slower (read: not Samsung) MLC NVMe SSDs.
The 99th percentile read latency of the Intel SSD 760p on The Destroyer is rather poor, and the 99th percentile write latency isn't great either. The 760p doesn't seem to have serious problems with garbage collection pauses, but The Destroyer definitely does stress the 760p.
The energy consumption of the Intel SSD 760p during The Destroyer is almost as low as Samsung's best NVMe SSDs, but nowhere near the SATA-like efficiency of the Toshiba XG5. Overall, the 760p is much more efficient than Intel's previous NVMe SSDs, but there's still room for improvement.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
Dr. Swag - Tuesday, January 23, 2018 - linkWhat happened to your performance consistency tests?
ImSpartacus - Wednesday, January 24, 2018 - linkI'm glad I wasn't the only one that noticed them missing.
I'd love to get a comment on why that is omitted.
SleepyFE - Saturday, January 27, 2018 - linkJust assume it's not consistent enough to measure up. It is an Intel product after all. If they don't won't it published it won't be.
jjj - Tuesday, January 23, 2018 - linkFair perf for the price but not exciting.
Any word on a timing for their lower end 660p QLC based drive?
HStewart - Tuesday, January 23, 2018 - linkSo this does not used Micron memory, I remember reading that Intel stop work with Micron - maybe this is part of it.
This is aim and price at lower end market - and came out at same time as the 860, maybe Intel has a faster one coming later this year. If so that is actually very smart on Intel's part.
edzieba - Tuesday, January 23, 2018 - linkThe Micron logo is printed right there on the packages for all to see...
emvonline - Tuesday, January 23, 2018 - linkthats dram
HStewart - Tuesday, January 23, 2018 - linkYes - I see that but did Intel designed the memory - also a lot of times company purchase other products in there own products - Intel has done this with AMD GPU's because it feels a hole with discrete GPU until they can provide a replacement.
msabercr - Tuesday, January 23, 2018 - linkAll the nand is IMFT, Intel has just also leveraged their own fabs to produce more for themselves. All the nand designs are joint venture.
jjj - Tuesday, January 23, 2018 - linkIntel and Micron will stop developing NAND together with their 4th gen, this is the second gen, 3rd gen starts prod in second half of 2018 and 4th gen comes 1 year or more later. So you'll see products with that in 2020.
Intel has it's own fab now , producing NAND developed with Micron (and so does Micron ofc) but Intel still has supply agreements (at cost) with Micron and those expire in 2018 and 2019.