Having just wrapped up a bit ago is AMD’s 2015 Financial Analyst Day (FAD). For AMD FADs are a combination of roadmap updates and number breakdowns for financial analysts and investors, showcasing where the company intends to go and why investors should continue to back the company.

We’ve been covering FAD 2015 throughout the afternoon, and we have seen AMD make a number of announcements and roadmap reveals throughout the event. The individual announcements are below, and meanwhile now that the event has wrapped up we want to provide a quick summary of what AMD is going to be up to over the next two years.

AMD Charts Future Growth Opportunities
AMD’s 2016-2017 x86 Roadmap: Zen Is In, Skybridge Is Out
AMD’s K12 ARM CPU Now In 2017
AMD’s 2016 GPU Roadmap: FinFET & High Bandwidth Memory
AMD To Launch New Desktop GPU This Quarter (Q2’15) With HBM
AMD Announces 6th Generation A-Series APU Branding - Carrizo Due This Quarter
AMD’s 2016-2017 Datacenter Roadmap: x86, ARM, and GPGPU

With AMD’s FAD 2012 being a major event for the company – one where then-CEO Rory Reed announced AMD’s intention to move away from being almost solely PC focused to a mix of PC, semi-custom, and ARM products – FAD 2015 by comparison is a far more tame event. Under the direction of Dr. Lisa Su, AMD is largely executing on the plan they set into motion some time ago. And where they have made changes, such as dropping SeaMicro, AMD has announced those changes in advance. So this year’s FAD does not see AMD announcing major changes to the company’s direction.

So what is AMD’s direction over the next two years? The short answer to that is that the company is focusing on what they believe to be higher margin, higher growth opportunity markets where they can take a chunk of those markets without necessarily having to wrest revenue and sales from existing competitors. Overall AMD sees their three big growth markets as gaming, immersive platforms, and the datacenter market.

At the same time what AMD is looking to avoid is low-margin markets where they can’t do something to set themselves apart. AMD has made it clear that they’re not going to invest in fields such as mobile (smartphones/tablets) or IoT client devices, as while that’s a high growth field, it’s already overweight with competitors who either have the cost control (MediaTek) or the war chest (Intel) to drive margins down to levels AMD cannot sustain. Similarly, AMD is working to reduce their presence in the low-end PC market, as that too suffers from low margins, and is coupled with a poor outlook that has seen AMD get burnt by a significant drop in demand (and consequently revenue) in that market.

The one exception to this of course is semi-custom silicon, which although is not high-margin, allows AMD to leverage their strengths. Nowhere else can you find a vendor with a top-tier GPU profile, custom x86 CPUs, custom ARM CPUs, and the willingness to help customers build customized chips around those building blocks. Semi-custom silicon also presents AMD with some relatively stable revenue, as contracts for semi-custom designs will typically involve supplying chips for a number of years.

To achieve their goals, AMD has set out a roadmap through 2016 and 2017 to develop the technologies necessary to compete in their respective markets, and to deliver the performance necessary for both semi-custom silicon and finished AMD products.

The big item on AMD’s agenda is of course Zen, the company’s forthcoming x86 CPU design. Scheduled to launch in 2016, starting with the high-performance desktop, Zen is a return to fundamentals of sorts for AMD. We do not have performance estimates for Zen, but from an architectural standpoint AMD is making it clear that they are shooting for much higher IPC with Zen than Carrizo/Excavator, touting a 40% increase in IPC.

Zen will ultimately be driving AMD’s entire range of x86 products, top to bottom, datacenter to laptop. AMD’s Dozer and Cat families are at an end, and in the end there will be only Zen. Zen in turn will be part of a long-term process for AMD; the company already has newer iterations of Zen in the works (Zen+) which further improve on the architecture farther out. Coupled with significant gains AMD is expecting to enjoy from FinFET processes, and the company is putting on their optimistic face for their chances in the x86 market.

In fact AMD is backing Zen to the point where other projects have been pushed to the wayside or canceled altogether. AMD’s project Skybridge – a plan for 20nm ambidextrous x86 and ARM CPUs – has essentially been canceled as a result of the combination of lack of customer need for ambidextrous CPUs and the generally poor performance of the 20nm process. Meanwhile Zen’s ARM sibling – K12 – has been pushed back from 2016 to 2017 to allow AMD to complete Zen first, and then roll what they’ve learned from Zen into K12.

For AMD this marks a return to form, and a very aggressive move on the x86 market. After having seen their datacenter market share fall to just 1.5%, for example – with the company admitting they did not invest in high-performance CPUs and it cost them most of their market share – AMD is optimistic that they can recover their datacenter market share through the combination of Zen, K12, and their GPGPU capabilities. This in turn means hitting the datacenter in both the CPU and HPC markets, and even going one step beyond with a forthcoming, very high performance HPC APU that combines all of AMD’s strengths.

Meanwhile on the GPU front, AMD is not providing quite as much visibility on their GPU roadmap, but they are sharing their plans out to 2016. Launching this quarter will be a new AMD desktop product featuring High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), the first such product in the GPU space. HBM promises to significantly increase AMD’s available memory bandwidth and allow their partners to work on more innovative card designs due to the smaller amount of space an HBM solution requires.

2016 in turn will see AMD continue their focus on HBM with the release of products using HBM Gen2, all the while releasing their first GPUs manufactured on a FinFET process. AMD isn’t naming which process they’re using, though either way it would be a significant step up in manufacturing from the current 28nm process their GPUs use. Overall AMD is touting a 2x increase in perf-per-watt for their 2016 GPUs, with most of that gain coming from the shift to FinFET.

Longer term, while AMD is not committing towards any specific products, AMD is strongly hinting at HBM coming to APUs as well. AMD’s APUs have traditionally struggled under the limited amount of bandwidth 128-bit DDR3 provides, so an HBM-enabled APU would help to further improve AMD’s GPU performance on their APUs.

Wrapping things up, the key to AMD’s plans for the next two years will hinge on both properly anticipating the market and in executing on technology. AMD will need to correctly predict opportunities to grow – particularly rapidly expanding markets as opposed to stealing revenue from existing players – and then execute on that in a timely manner with solid hardware across both the CPU and GPU space. AMD believes they have the pieces they need in development, and with 2015 almost half-over the company is finally reaching the point where their earlier transition is complete, so it will be interesting to see how AMD’s next two years unfold. The company is not yet in dire straits, but after losing market share and seeing gross margins suffer, now is the time where AMD needs to reverse their fortunes and reach profitability if they’re to ensure their own future.

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • melgross - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    Sigh! Zen sounds like many of their other, not yet available, products: 40% better performance, power power draw, yadda yadda yadda. But when the time comes, they can't come close to what they promised.

    So this all seems very optimistic to me. How many times do companies that are having severe problems make announcements that this is the new stuff that will change everything? All too often. How many times are they right? Not that often.
  • w0mbat - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    Sigh! How I hate to generalized comments who didn't even read the article before posting.

    They aren't talking about 40% better performance, they talk about 40%+ more IPC, which is very specific and only part of what constitutes the actual performance of a CPU. That means they are breaking away from the module design they introduced with Bulldozer and focus more on beefier cores. They didn't even talk about the power draw yet.

    If Zen comes with 8C+HT in 2016 it will compete with Broadwell-E on Socket 2011, which is extremely expensive and could very well have about the same IPC, a big step forward from the current situation. It is pretty safe to assume that even Cannonlake on Socket 1151 will only come with 4C+HT.

    This isn't very optimistic at all. They target an IPC performance level which is around Intel's Haswell generation.

    So please, stop posting such uninformed comments, or at least try to read and understand the article before hand. Thank you!
  • jimmy$mitty - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    Depending on the actual performance of the CPU the costs will vary. If it is performing on the same level as Broadwell-E then you better bet that it will cost as much as Broadwell-E. If it performs better, it will cost more. This is also of course if the power levels also fit the bill and we have yet to see how well the FinFET they are using performs in that arena.

    That is how it has and always will work.

    I am optimistic yet, as I think melgross was saying, hesitant to trust anything from AMDs marketing. Hell I don't even 100% trust Intel's marketing or any other company as they always use best case scenarios and not real world scenarios.

    SO we can hope this will turn it around for AMD because I don't think they can last much longer running as they have been.
  • w0mbat - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    > That is how it has and always will work.

    That is just plain and simple a wrong statement. Just take a brief look at AMDs history and you will find that products on the same level as their competitors usually are cheaper. So if and 8C+HT Zen performs on the same level an an Broadwell-E 8C+HT, it surely will be cheaper. With more performance, it might be on a similar price level.
  • jimmy$mitty - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    The last time AMD held the CPU performance crown they had CPUs that cost more than Intel. That was during the Pentium 4 and Athlon 64 days. FX series CPUs cost about $1K+ and were the best you could get.

    However, when Intel released the first Core 2 Quad at $500 bucks it beat the FX series that was still way higher than it.

    And that is historical fact. You can try to deny it all you want but when AMD has a better performing part, they can demand a higher price. If you look at their GPUs it shows as well. Whenever their GPUs were the top performers they were equal to or higher than NVidia yet when they were lower performing they were cheaper. When the HD7970GHz came out, it launched at $549 bucks but could only be purchased for about $600. And it justified the price as it pounded the G600 series. However, if we look at the HD6970 it launched at $369 (cheaper than the GTX480 even) because overall it performed a bit worse than the GTX580 at $500 bucks.

    That is how the market works and people tend to deny it but it is and it will happen. I know so many people who want to think that AMD is a company that cares about them. Well they do but more that you buy their products and they make money, just like NVidia, Intel and most every other company out there.

    That said, I am excited for the R9 390X and I have been buying Radeons since the 9700Pro but that wont stop me from seeing the truth that there is a chance that it will cost more than the equivalent or lower performing NVidia/Intel product.
  • chizow - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    Exactly! I've said this so many times but all the AMD fans who think that company is some benevolent entity that steals from the rich to give to the poor.

    All you hear repeated on the internet is how we need AMD to not just thrive, but survive, because competition is good but the fact is, the last time AMD thrived, they priced people like me out of the market for their CPUs! Athlon 64s STARTED at $400 ($450 after mark-ups) so I had no problems at all switching to Intel when their $330 E6600 blew everything AMD had out of the water for a fraction of the price.

    Same thing with the 7970, as you mentioned. AMD sure was competitive then and used the opportunity to piggy-back on last-gen 40nm pricing. AMD fans said it was fully deserved, press didn't seem to mind either, but the 7970's performance was nothing special which allowed Nvidia to jump their 2nd fastest Kepler chip to their flagship SKU, and create a new ultra premium part called Titan.
  • lilmoe - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    Competition drives prices down. That's the main point I guess. Intel still charges $1K for their top tier Core and $2.5k for their top Xeon. If AMD delivers, you can say goodbye to that pricing, or at least better performance increase the more you pay, not the silly 20-30% for 3x the price.
  • chizow - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    Yeah once again, no guarantee of that, indeed you were just given 2 examples of competition driving prices up. What if AMD pulls off a miracle and actually beats Intel performance, and instead of staying the course of bargain basement pricing, looks to be rewarded for their efforts? They could slot right in lock and step with Intel's pricing and who loses? AMD users who aren't accustomed to paying more than say $200 for their CPUs.
  • Ranger101 - Thursday, May 7, 2015 - link

    A little advice chizow...

    First, please attempt to extract the MASSIVE nvidia carrot visibly protruding from your butt...
    and secondly please abandon all attempts to appear impartial in your commentary. It just makes
    you seem even more idiotic...

    Thanks in advance.
  • chizow - Thursday, May 7, 2015 - link

    AMD butthurt defense ranger on duty I see!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now