AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy

Our Heavy storage benchmark is proportionally more write-heavy than The Destroyer, but much shorter overall. The total writes in the Heavy test aren't enough to fill the drive, so performance never drops down to steady state. This test is far more representative of a power user's day to day usage, and is heavily influenced by the drive's peak performance. The Heavy workload test details can be found here.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Data Rate)

The Heavy test doesn't write enough data to fill a 120GB drive, and when there's still spare area the 750 EVO performs better than any other planar TLC drive. When the test is run on a full drive the 750 EVO suffers more than most and falls to the bottom of the rankings.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Latency)

The penalty that the 750 EVO pays when filled is even more apparent when looking at average service times, pushing it into last place.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Latency)

Even when starting on an empty drive, the 750 EVO's latency outlier situation isn't great, beating the ADATA SP550 but little else.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Power)

The energy usage of the 750 EVO only stands out for the full drive case. When starting with an empty drive, the 750 EVO uses less energy overall than the other planar TLC drives.

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer AnandTech Storage Bench - Light
Comments Locked

109 Comments

View All Comments

  • Shadow7037932 - Friday, April 22, 2016 - link

    The prices aren't competitive. The Ultra II in particular tends to go on sale rather often for around $50.
  • Shadow7037932 - Friday, April 22, 2016 - link

    Also, if it's anything like the price drop we saw with the 850 EVOs, this could drop down to ~$50 or so in a few months I think.
  • barleyguy - Friday, April 22, 2016 - link

    This drive hasn't been out long enough to know what price it will go on sale for. So I consider any comments on pricing pretty irrelevant.

    Outside of that, there are only 3 brands of SSD I trust my data to, which is Intel, Crucial/Micron, and Samsung. I'll pay more for those 3 brands than I will other brands, because of reliability.
  • AkulaClass - Friday, April 22, 2016 - link

    As 250GB low cost I would grab a SanDisk Ultra II.
  • barleyguy - Friday, April 22, 2016 - link

    8 of the 48 reviews of that drive on NewEgg are "worked great until it died in a month and I lost my data". As I said in another post, Intel, Crucial, and Samsung are IMO on a different tier of reliability than everybody else.
  • Shadow7037932 - Saturday, April 23, 2016 - link

    I like how you're saying Samsung there without considering the issues they've had with the 840. Out of all three you mentioned, only Intel has had solid SSDs since the first gen.
  • barleyguy - Saturday, April 23, 2016 - link

    I actually own an 840 Evo in my daughter's laptop. The issues with it never involved data loss or "early death", only degraded performance. Even in its degraded performance mode it still feels faster than a hard drive. And the patches they issued to "fix" it work pretty well to restore it back to SSD-like performance.

    So, in short, I still trust Samsung on the SSD front way more than Sandisk.

    Though I don't disagree that Intel makes excellent SSDs. They're the way to go for a "critical main desktop" type application.
  • andrewaggb - Sunday, April 24, 2016 - link

    I was going to say that as well. I have an 840 evo in my machine and I haven't lost any data. I regret purchasing it... but it works. The only SSD I've had die so far was a Kingston V100. Still have a couple intel 320 series ssd's running strong, a couple sandisk ones (don't recall the model numbers) that are working and a crucial M500 that is working.
  • Dwedit - Sunday, April 24, 2016 - link

    I had the old Intel X25-M, and it had a catastrophic failure where the disk name changed to "BAD CONTEXT" and size changed to 8MB.
  • K_Space - Wednesday, April 27, 2016 - link

    X25-M (version 2) still going strong here just not as a main drive since 80Gb is puny. I have both SD Ultra II (960Gb) and 2x Extreme Pro (480Gb) going with no problems. The Extreme Pro was purchased straight after Anadtech glowing review particularly with its 10 years warranty. Not sure what the warranty is for the Ultra II but wouldn't be surprised if its 5+. For every review that says: my SSD died, you'll get a "my SSD is alive & well" so take em with a pinch of salt. It all depends on usage scenario and user expertise and we know how variable that can be.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now